NCLEX Pass Rates: What They Measure, and What They Do Not
Pass rates are published quarterly by NCSBN and quoted constantly by nursing programmes. They are a useful signal and a widely misread one. Here is how to read them, and what a school's rate does and does not tell you.
Key point: strong nursing writing makes every clinical conclusion traceable to assessment data, relevant evidence, and a defined outcome.
What NCSBN actually publishes
The National Council of State Boards of Nursing publishes NCLEX volume and pass-rate statistics quarterly and annually. The data is broken down by exam type, by whether the candidate is a first-time or repeat tester, and by whether they were educated in the United States or internationally.
State boards of nursing separately publish pass rates for individual education programmes within their jurisdiction, which is where school-level figures come from. These are usually annual rather than quarterly.
Because reporting periods and cohorts differ between these sources, two accurate figures for the same school can disagree. Always note which period and which cohort a number refers to before comparing it with another.
The best academic structure does not decorate the clinical reasoning—it makes that reasoning visible.
First-time versus repeat is the distinction that matters
First-time pass rates for candidates educated in the United States are consistently and substantially higher than repeat pass rates. This is the single most important thing to understand about the statistics.
The reason is selection rather than the exam becoming harder. Candidates retaking the exam are, by definition, drawn from those who did not clear the standard first time. A lower repeat rate does not mean a retake is unusually difficult; it means the group attempting it differs.
When a school or a prep provider quotes a pass rate without saying whether it is first-time or overall, treat the figure as marketing rather than data until you know.
How to read a nursing programme's rate
A programme's NCLEX pass rate is one of the few outcome measures published consistently across schools, which makes it genuinely useful when choosing where to apply. State boards commonly set an expected threshold and place programmes below it under review.
But read it with cohort size in mind. A programme graduating twelve students has a pass rate that moves ten percentage points if one person fails. Small-cohort figures are noisy and a single year tells you little; look at three years together.
Consider attrition alongside it. A programme that dismisses struggling students before graduation reports a higher NCLEX rate than one that supports them through. The rate measures who sat the exam, not who started the programme.
Internationally educated candidates
Pass rates for internationally educated candidates are markedly lower than for US-educated first-time testers. Several factors contribute: differences in curriculum emphasis, unfamiliarity with the computerised adaptive format, and the language register of the questions rather than language proficiency as such.
The practical implication is preparation strategy rather than ability. Candidates educated outside the United States generally benefit most from format familiarisation and from working through prioritisation and delegation content, which is weighted more heavily on the NCLEX than in many other curricula.
If you fall into this group, budget preparation time for the American scope-of-practice content specifically. It is the area that most reliably surprises otherwise well-prepared nurses.
What the number cannot tell you
A pass rate says nothing about clinical placement quality, faculty availability, class size or how supported you would feel. Those are the things graduates most often cite as decisive, and none of them appear in the statistic.
It also says nothing about your own probability of passing. Your preparation, your prerequisite performance and your practice-question accuracy predict your result far better than your school's aggregate does.
Use the rate as one filter among several — particularly to exclude programmes that sit persistently below their state's threshold — rather than as a ranking.
Finding current figures
Go to NCSBN's statistics publications for national and quarterly data, and to your state board of nursing for programme-level figures. Both are free and both are authoritative. Third-party ranking sites frequently republish figures years out of date.
Check the publication date on any figure you find. Pass rates shift when the test plan is revised or when a new practice analysis takes effect, so a rate quoted from several cycles ago may describe a different exam.
If a programme quotes its own rate in marketing, ask which year, which cohort, and whether it is first-time only. Reputable programmes answer that question readily.
A Quick Quality Check
Use these signals when reviewing your own draft before submission.
Clinical Focus
Strong: The population, setting, and priority problem are explicit.
Revise: The discussion could apply to any patient or setting.
Evidence Link
Strong: Important claims are connected to an appropriate source or assessment cue.
Revise: Recommendations appear without a rationale or traceable evidence.
Measurable Result
Strong: The reader can tell what success looks like and when it will be assessed.
Revise: The conclusion uses broad words such as “better” without a measure.
References and Further Reading
- NCSBN. NCLEX Statistics and Publications, published quarterly and annually.
- State boards of nursing publish programme-level pass rates; figures vary by reporting period.
About the Author
Mitchelle, Nurse Educator
Mitchelle is a nurse educator on the NursingAnswers team. She writes and reviews the study guides and question rationales used across our NCLEX-RN, TEAS and HESI banks.
View Author Profile